01 / Case study
Life Essentials
Sometimes the right product decision is not to build the product.
- Client
- Nationwide · Direct-to-consumer term life
- Role
- Product & Innovation Strategy · UX Research · Partner Design Lead
- Research
- Build or partner
- Bestow partnership
- Design governance
- Launch
- Commercial outcome
Nationwide wanted to make buying term life insurance significantly easier online.
The obvious starting point might have been to redesign the existing digital experience. But a more important question came first: should Nationwide build a new experience itself at all?
I was asked to assess the existing digital buying journey and help decide whether Nationwide should invest in building a new product internally, or partner with a company that already had much of the technology and infrastructure it needed.
My recommendation was to partner.
That decision became Nationwide Life Essentials: a direct-to-consumer term-life product that lets eligible customers apply online, get an automated underwriting decision in minutes and get covered without a medical exam.
02 / The decision before the design
It wasn’t a matter of redesigning screens.
The existing life-insurance buying journey had built up the kind of complexity that tends to develop inside a large financial-services organization. The customer experience sat on top of underwriting processes, internal systems, operational workflows, regulatory requirements and years of organizational decisions.
Before investing in a new experience, Nationwide needed to know whether rebuilding all of that internally was actually the right thing to do. I was asked to investigate the existing journey and help answer a strategic question.
Build or partner?
That meant looking past interface usability, at the whole system it would take to deliver the product.
03 / Understanding what we already had
I was looking underneath the experience.
I audited the existing digital life-insurance buying experience and researched how customers moved through it. But the screens were only the surface. The questions that mattered were about what sat behind them.
What the audit was really asking
- 01Where was the complexity coming from?
- 02Which problems were actually interface problems?
- 03Which were consequences of internal processes or technology?
- 04What would have to change behind the scenes to create the experience customers now expect from a digital financial product?
- 05What would it realistically take for Nationwide to build and maintain that capability itself?
The research made it increasingly clear that redesigning the existing journey would leave most of the underlying constraints where they were. We needed to think about the product differently.
04 / Build vs. partner
Two paths.
Build internally
Nationwide could design and develop a new digital buying experience itself. That offered more direct control, but needed substantial investment across product, design, engineering, underwriting, operations and supporting systems. It would also take time.
- More internal development
- Longer path to market
- Greater implementation burden
- Full internal ownership
Partner with Bestow
Or Nationwide could work with a company that had already built much of the digital infrastructure, and put its own effort into making that capability work for Nationwide customers, products and regulatory requirements.
- Existing digital infrastructure
- Faster path to market
- Lower internal build burden
- Nationwide governance + partner capability
↑ the recommendation
Through research, analysis of the experience and an understanding of the operational realities behind the existing journey, I concluded that the second path was stronger.
The recommendation
My recommendation was that Nationwide should not build the product from scratch.We should partner.
Bestow already had much of the capability needed to deliver a modern digital life-insurance experience. Working with them offered a path to market that I believed would be faster, less expensive and stronger at launch than trying to recreate the same capability internally.
The value of the research wasn’t another list of usability issues. It helped answer a much larger question about where Nationwide should spend its time and money.
05 / From recommendation to delivery
Recommending a partner didn’t mean walking away.
My role changed. I became the bridge between Nationwide and Bestow’s design team, working closely with them and providing design leadership and governance on Nationwide’s behalf.
Bestow
Understood its technology.
Nationwide
Understood its customers, brand, products and obligations as a major insurer.
I reviewed and directed the experience work so the product met Nationwide’s expectations across:
- 01Customer experience
- 02Brand
- 03Accessibility
- 04Insurance requirements
- 05Regulatory requirements
- 06Compliance
That meant balancing the speed and flexibility of an outside technology partner with the standards and responsibilities of a large, regulated financial institution.
The goal wasn’t to make Bestow’s product look like Nationwide. It was to make a Nationwide product with the advantages of Bestow’s technology, without compromising the things Nationwide needed to get right.
06 / What we launched
A process that could now happen largely online.
Nationwide Life Essentials launched in 2023 as a direct-to-consumer term-life product. Eligible customers could go through the whole thing online, get an automated underwriting decision in minutes and get covered without the medical exam many life-insurance products still need.
- 10 & 20Year term coverage
- $1.5MCoverage, up to
- OnlineDigital application
- AutomatedUnderwriting
- MinutesFor a decision, where possible
- No examFor eligible customers
Source: Nationwide, June 2023
07 / What happened
A new way to sell term life.
Life Essentials became more than a redesigned customer journey. It became a new digital distribution model for Nationwide’s term-life business. Following launch, the partnership I helped Nationwide evaluate and bring to market reported these results.
- +20%Term-life sales since the April 2023 launch, which Bestow attributes to the partnership
- 2×+Application completion: more than doubled, Bestow reports
- 69%Of applicants over 18 months were first-time life-insurance buyers, Bestow reports
- 94%Of customers report five-star satisfaction, Nationwide says, based on Trustpilot reviews
Bestow also reports the first version launched in four months, with more than 30 product and experience enhancements in its first six. In 2026, Money named Nationwide the best overall no-exam life insurer.
Sources: Bestow, January 2025 · Nationwide · Money, 2026
These are results of the Life Essentials partnership as a whole, delivered by many people at Nationwide and Bestow. My contribution came earlier: the research and assessment that helped Nationwide decide to pursue the partnership in the first place, and then the design leadership that kept the product to Nationwide’s standards.
08 / Looking back
Deciding what not to build.
One of the easiest traps in product development is assuming that because you’ve found a problem, you should build the solution yourself. This project reinforced something I’ve carried into a lot of my work since: the right product decision isn’t always deciding what to build. Sometimes it’s deciding what not to build.
Research gave us enough understanding of the customer experience, internal processes and organizational constraints to make a more fundamental recommendation about how Nationwide should invest. Partnering let the organization move faster, avoid building everything internally and start from a stronger digital foundation.
My role then shifted from researcher and strategist to partner design lead, making sure the thing we launched still met the standards expected of Nationwide.
The part I find most interesting
Understand the problem well enough to know where the organization should place the bet. Then stay long enough to help make the decision work.